A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Tatankaceratops






Tatankaceratops

Tatankaceratops (TAH-tank-ah-SAIR-uh-tops; “Bison horned face”) is a genus of ceratopsian dinosaur that lived during the very end of the Late Cretaceous period, approximately 66 million years ago, in what is now South Dakota, USA. The name combines the Lakota Sioux word “tatanka” (bison) with the Greek words “keras” (horn) and “ops” (face), referring to its horned appearance. Tatankaceratops was named and described by paleontologists Christopher J. Ott and Peter L. Larson in 2010 based on a single, incomplete skull found in the Hell Creek Formation. However, the validity of Tatankaceratops as a distinct genus is highly controversial, with many paleontologists arguing that the fossil material actually represents a juvenile individual of the well-known dinosaur Triceratops.

Description and Classification

Tatankaceratops was described as a relatively small horned dinosaur, noticeably smaller than an adult Triceratops. It belongs to the family Ceratopsidae, which includes other famous horned dinosaurs like Styracosaurus and Chasmosaurus. The original describers placed it within the Chasmosaurinae subfamily, the same group that includes Triceratops. They suggested it had a unique combination of features that seemed to mix traits from both adult and juvenile ceratopsians, leading them to classify it as a new, small species.

The classification of Tatankaceratops remains a subject of scientific debate. The main point of discussion is whether the fossil skull shows features that are truly unique to a distinct species, or if these features are simply characteristic of a young Triceratops as it was growing. Horned dinosaurs like Triceratops are known to have undergone significant changes in their skull shape, horn size, and frill structure as they matured from hatchlings to adults.

Distinguishing Features

The original description of Tatankaceratops highlighted several features thought to set it apart. However, many paleontologists now interpret these characteristics as being consistent with those of a juvenile Triceratops. The features initially noted for Tatankaceratops included:

  • A relatively small overall skull size compared to adult chasmosaurines.
  • Brow horns (located above the eyes) that were said to angle backwards at their base but then curve forwards towards their tips.
  • A nasal horn that was present but relatively small.
  • A short, solid bone frill at the back of the skull, which did not have large openings (fenestrae), similar to the frill of Triceratops.
  • The presence of some bone fusions typically seen in adult dinosaurs, despite the skull’s small size and seemingly juvenile horn development.

Further studies by other researchers have argued that this combination of features aligns with the known growth patterns (ontogeny) seen in Triceratops. For instance, the direction and shape of horns, as well as the frill’s development, changed considerably as a Triceratops grew.

Paleoenvironment and Diet

Tatankaceratops fossils were discovered in the Hell Creek Formation. During the latest Cretaceous period, this region of North America was a warm and humid coastal plain, featuring rivers, floodplains, swamps, and forests. This environment supported a diverse ecosystem rich in plant and animal life.

Like all ceratopsians, Tatankaceratops was a herbivore. It would have used its strong, beak-like mouth to snip off ferns, cycads, and early flowering plants. Inside its mouth, it had rows of teeth packed together, called dental batteries, which were used to slice and grind tough plant material. It shared its habitat with many other dinosaurs, including the apex predator Tyrannosaurus rex, large plant-eaters like the duck-billed Edmontosaurus and the armored Ankylosaurus, and numerous individuals of Triceratops at various growth stages.

Significance and Ongoing Research

The main significance of Tatankaceratops lies in the scientific discussion it generated regarding dinosaur growth and the challenges of identifying new dinosaur species. It highlights how difficult it can be to distinguish a genuinely new, small species from a juvenile of a larger, already known species, especially when dealing with incomplete fossils. This is particularly true for ceratopsian dinosaurs, which showed dramatic changes as they grew.

Ongoing research and debate continue to focus on whether Tatankaceratops is a valid genus. The current consensus among many paleontologists is that the specimen is more likely a young Triceratops, or that the material is too ambiguous to definitively call it a new genus, possibly rendering it a nomen dubium (a doubtful name). Studying fossils like the one attributed to Tatankaceratops helps scientists better understand how dinosaurs grew and developed, which is essential for accurately assessing dinosaur diversity and the structure of prehistoric ecosystems, particularly during the final stages before the mass extinction event that ended the Mesozoic Era.


Scroll to Top